pull down to refresh

211 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 13h \ parent \ on: my problem with zaps the_stacker_muse
zaps aren't genuine but self-interested
zaps don't have to be genuine, that's what is so great about them. Genuine or not, a zap has a cost. So, any system built on the signal provided by zaps is more reliable than a system built on some far less costly signal (likes, views, even followers).
since zappers know they get the funds back via rewards.
This seems to be the more relevant question: is the way rewards are calibrated now breaking the important cost-elements of SN?
write
preview
this territory is moderated
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @denlillaapan 11h
that seems reasonable enough... in eq, the cost element should matter more than whether something is genuine (who cares, really?!)
reply