pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @bitcoingraffiti OP 19h \ parent \ on: I will sign no Treaty art
The monochromization I apply because it's a picture from my sketchbook with all kinds of unwanted grey tones and shadows. But if the monochrome version hurts the eyes too badly, then I'll def consider a softer background.
If that's what you meant?
Thanks for the feedback otherwise.
You should never compromise on your own notion or concept.
I just wanted to write something because I genuinely like it, If it was something I saw around town, I'd be very curious about what it is, where it came from. I like things that are representative of values but open to interpretation. Also, maybe I think more from a design brief perspective. Might be something your less concerned with, like, if this became (god forbid) corporate logo/identity, it would need to be able to used on merchandise or whatever. What I was saying about like a dark mode version, was more just me thinking about how things look on screen, when framed by black/white page.
I guess because I didn't see the original sketch, I just see more of a graphic image, rather than a piece of art in it's own right. When I've seen art at Bitcoin conferences, just feel that there's so much cool Bitcoin adjacent art. That's nice that it lends itself to design as I was saying above.
I wouldn't want to buy a hat or tee with any reference to Bitcoin for obvious reasons, but I also do. If you know what I mean?
reply
I'm not compromising.
You're compromising your own feedback.
reply