I’m looking for a new watch since mine broke. I want something simple and durable, and within that range, the Casio G-Shock DW5600 seemed like the most obvious choice. Then I came across an endless number of copies — some poorly made, others well made — and the dilemma: pay more for the original or less for a fake?

With the original, I have some assurance that the product was made following and respecting construction standards from a company with years of reputation in quality and durability. With the knockoffs, I know I’ll be paying for what I’m getting: a poorly made, low-quality product that does meet my basic need — telling the time.

I haven’t made up my mind yet. I tend to lean toward the original for its durability and for a somewhat off-track thought I had while rambling about all this.

The original is the longest proof-of-work chain in what it proposes to be, and it should be respected for that. However, the longest work chain isn’t built from the work of a single worker, but rather of many — which favors poorly made copies. Still, knockoffs are nothing more than cheaper versions that need to resemble the original in appearance. So, using quality materials and precision in construction is a waste of resources for something that’s supposed to be cheap. I thus conclude that fake copies are nothing but crap.

I’d appreciate any suggestions for watches like that — they don’t need to be expensive. I just need them to tell time, be tough, and be durable. By the way, if there’s any DIY option out there, I’d love to know about it.