pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Khunsa OP 2 Aug \ parent \ on: Update 2/08/25 | ZatoBox after the Hackathon: clarity, focus, and what's coming builders
Thanks for the comment, @anon. Looking back, not making it to the next round might’ve been a good sign. The ICP part was more of a tactical experiment (haha). Honestly, I’m not a fan of tokens with no backing or projects that offer no real value.
But if you were in my shoes, trying to get a bit of funding without compromising principles just to push real Bitcoin adoption harder doesn’t sound too bad, right?
Feel free to check out the GitHub in the coming weeks. Everything’s being cleaned up, and it’ll be 100% open source, verifiable… and ICP-free. In fact, we only used ICP to meet the minimum identity requirement for the hackathon we didn’t go beyond basic user registration (haha). So rest assured: zero commitment to ICP.
ZatoBox is and will always be 100% Bitcoin. No gimmicks.
And yes, some fiat too so people who are still outside the orange circle can cross over more easily. 🔶