pull down to refresh


Meta told employees that it is going to allow some coding job candidates to use an AI assistant during the interview process, according to internal Meta communications seen by 404 Media. The company has also asked existing employees to volunteer for a “mock AI-enabled interview,” the messages say.
While it’s true that many tech companies have pushed software engineers to use AI in their work, they have been slower to allow new applicants to use AI during the interview process. In fact, Anthropic, which makes the AI tool Claude, has specifically told job applicants that they cannot use AI during the interview process. To circumvent that type of ban, some AI tools promise to allow applicants to secretly use AI during coding interviews. The topic, in general, has been a controversial one in Silicon Valley. Established software engineers worry that the next batch of coders will be more AI “prompters” and “vibecoders” than software engineers, and that they may not know how to troubleshoot AI-written code when something goes wrong.
Looks like vibe Coding is here to saty!
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @RamPl 11h
Honestly, this was inevitable. If companies expect engineers to use AI on the job, why pretend interviews should be done solo with pen and paper? That said, there's a real risk of hiring people who can prompt but can’t debug. Maybe interviews should evolve to test how you use AI not just whether you can get it to spit out a solution.
reply
50 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 8h
I was working my way through this paper earlier and it seems as if since 3 days humanity maybe understands why softmax attention parametrization works better than linear (even though it's not used in many models anymore because it's expensive to run.)
So I don't find it crazy that the AI companies look to hire talent that can actually address open issues like that, instead of using inference. For non-ai tech companies though - yeah, inevitable.
reply
reply