I think most of the "problems" come from political propaganda.

Everything has pros and cons, and comes with a risk/reward analysis. ALL energy sources on the planet come with negative trade-offs. Political propaganda ignores the tradeoffs and just focuses on whichever pro or con supports their narrative.

What are the numbers for "reclaiming and recycling" parts from coal, fossil-fuels, nuclear, or solar? Way more difficult to recycle that shit. Wildlife is negatively affected by all of them as well.

Remember how brainwashed society was in the 90's about how nuclear power would create mutant animals? Absolutely nuts.... which is how you sound, talking about birds and cetaceans.

Nuclear power is absolutely amazing, and it was suppressed for decades because of political propaganda. Don't let the same thing happen to wind. That said, nuclear is 10x more important than wind. It is base-load, wind is not. But we should not demonize wind in the meantime. It's pretty damn good, with very minimal impact compared to the alternatives. If I see people trying to use wind as base-load, then I will speak out against them.... but adding small amounts of wind to grids around the world is very smart.