326 sats \ 0 replies \ @glix 15 Dec 2022
Ordinals are super cool. The concept of inscribing ordinals is even cooler. Actual NFTs on the blockchain. Obviously don't expect cryptopunks type quality here. If you have deep pockets though, then a fairly detailed png should be no problem to inscrbe. People should talk more about ordinals. Super cool!
reply
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @patrick 15 Dec 2022
This is pretty huge.
reply
30 sats \ 1 reply \ @phygit 15 Dec 2022
Super interesting, sure, but would need some "polishing" before going mainstream...
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @rodarmor fwd 16 Dec 2022
You don't think the homepage with a random collection of text strings and 10x10 pixel images is polished enough? Jeez, talk about a harsh critic ;)
reply
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @HardMoney 16 Dec 2022
This is pretty wild. I wonder what other use cases will emerge from the concept of attaching basically meta data to sats
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @hodlme 16 Dec 2022
Can we maybe...not clog up the blockchain with actual data? I can get behind a compact signature/hash that denotes ownership in an asset (house/car/random jpeg) but the actual data doesn't need to sit on-chain.
reply
110 sats \ 0 replies \ @ev OP 16 Dec 2022
If it’s off-chain, how do you make it decentralized?
If the data is on a centralized server, you’re trusting the server operator to keep that data available at the provided link in perpetuity. IPFS still seems slightly immature, though maybe that’s an option.
Would be curious to hear more.
reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @Eximpius 1 Feb 2023
Fuck ordinals. Hopefully most node runners downgrade to 23.0 if they dont fix taproot to get this BSV bullshit out of BTC.
reply