pull down to refresh
153 sats \ 3 replies \ @Scoresby 9h \ on: The (literal) gift of hard money econ
It does look cool. It does make you wonder if we will have any tangible things to pass on to the generations that follow us. I'm not sure whether things from the early 20th century feel so much more quality simply because they are old or if there really was some difference that we've lost. Even "nice" modern things don't have the same weightiness.
(I know we all expect to pass on a few satoshis to our descendants, but that's not exactly something you can hold in your hand...)
Apparently, in the UK, gold coins are things arent subject to inheritance, so that could still be viable, plus it's a history thing too.
i know what you mean, though, most things aren't made to last.
i will make sure the kids inherit old lego sets tho, they hold their value #868604 and still look cool
reply
Oh man! I missed that post! It's excellent. My kids are right in the Lego years and you are totally right: they're pretty quality toys.
It does bring up an interesting thing point about inflation adjusted prices, though. It seems to me the sets you used as your examples are equivalent to sets that cost more than $120 these days.
I experience this phenomenon every time I hear about inflation a adjusted prices: they always seem startlingly low to me.
This kind of gets to the distinction you made in this post about the gold coin. "75GBP in today's money, but trades for 400-500 on eBay." I realize that there may be a collector's premium, but i wonder why is it that inflation adjusted pricing seems so much lower than the prices I feel like I experience day to day.
reply
I continue to think that we’re going to need tangible specie as part of our monetary system. If there’s no way for bitcoin to do that, it’s a real problem.
reply