So, when Harvard buys Bitcoin (or exposure via other other assets), does it irk their world renowned economics department (full of who I thought were Keynesians and modern monetary theorists always advocating for a bit more state control of credit and economy)?

Related, how much influence those Harvard economics even have on Harvard's own treasury strategy then, when many people seem to worship their opinions (not only Harvard, but the general circle of academic economists) as saviours or manager of the nation's treasury and contributing to central planning?

Should any Harvard economists (advocating for any further government control or regulation citing their superior knowledge and degree) be questioned on why Harvard is buying Bitcoin?