pull down to refresh
90 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 19 Aug \ on: Stacker Saloon
One pattern I've seen emerge as SN's relational complexity increases: you should prefer slow, complicated writes and fast, trivial reads to fast writes and slow reads. And especially when comprehensive and aggregate data reads are expected. Else you end up deducing relationships and history at read time which is inefficient and error prone.
It's kind of like the difference between someone pedantically stating their intent vs. guessing about their intent based on the result. If intent matters, and it almost always does, you should prefer the former.
great - I had to look up pedantically and now I am reconsidering how I view a certain someone I work with who threw this word around like candy once upon a time...though they use it less now???
reply