This only works with brigades. So having an unpopular opinion against a mob of fanbois with high trust score will mess you up. But nothing prevents you from posting again? But what's the point if there is a non-receptive majority?

Information wins, just boosts don't?

optimism

In the case of downzaps versus boosts, it seems that erring on the side of allowing visibility is better than erring the other way.

What I mean is: it's better to allow a scammer to boost and get visibility, than it is to allow a strong downzapper to hide content.

Reason: the tool we use to banish scammers can also be used by scammers to banish valuable content they don't want others to see.

Imagine a scenario where someone posts about a flaw in a project or bad behavior, if the owner of the project can banish such a post by heavily downzapping.

Don't we run greater risk to the community by allowing a strong power to hide information than we do by allowing a strong power to boost information?

Stacker Saloon

saloon

In the case of downzaps versus boosts, it seems that erring on the side of allowing visibility is better than erring the other way.

What I mean is: it's better to allow a scammer to boost and get visibility, than it is to allow a strong downzapper to hide content. 

Reason: the tool we use to banish scammers can also be used by scammers to banish valuable content they don't want others to see. 

Imagine a scenario where someone posts about a flaw in a project or bad behavior, if the owner of the project can banish such a post by heavily downzapping. 

Don't we run greater risk to the community by allowing a strong power to hide information than we do by allowing a strong power to boost information?