pull down to refresh
related posts
25 sats \ 8 replies \ @tosky 21 Dec 2022
is this an attack on Bitcoin?
reply
25 sats \ 1 reply \ @premitive1 22 Dec 2022
What is an attack on bitcoin?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @tosky 22 Dec 2022
what is not an attack on bitcoin? honest miners, historical nodes, prudent and conservative deelopment?
reply
20 sats \ 5 replies \ @cryptocoin OP 21 Dec 2022
Requires a soft fork.
Heres' some more info on Drivechains:
With Drivechain, Bitcoin Will Make Altcoins Obsolete
#60751
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/technical/drivechain-makes-bitcoin-the-only-crypto
reply
25 sats \ 4 replies \ @tosky 21 Dec 2022
precisely - good luck soft forking core with such a contentious proposal. not on my watch
reply
65 sats \ 3 replies \ @0276c7af57 21 Dec 2022
I mean, I see drivechains as a way to introduce the most future flexibility into the protocol with minimal current impact. This could be the last contentious UASF if implemented, and the core layer protocol could ossify, allowing all future experimentation to happen in the higher layers.
reply
25 sats \ 2 replies \ @tosky 22 Dec 2022
Well, and here we differ. I see drivechains as the most complicated soft fork proposal compared to Eltoo and SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT or x-input sigaggreg whilst its impact is hard to measure. I dont need digital AirMiles and shitcoins impacting game theory of Bitcoin layer - its already challenging with LN and other proposals. We are just fine
reply
25 sats \ 1 reply \ @premitive1 22 Dec 2022
one imagines you don't like BIP-300
view all 1 replies
25 sats \ 0 replies \ @lnproxy 20 Dec 2022
Yay! I want drivechains
reply