pull down to refresh
...and the new surface for attack :)
reply
That's the same people said about SegWit and LN when we were rooting for it to be activated on BTC after proven successful on LTC back in the days. :-)
reply
not a technical attack but government attack
e.g. LTC was delisted in South Korea LINK
reply
Do you really thing anybody'd care about that? As I said, MWEB isn't compulsory, it's not at layer 1, which is as transparent and open as has always been, like BTC's. Exchanges don't need to activate it at all.
Also, how many times has China banned BTC?
reply
as old russian sentence says: the quieter you go, the further you will be (the situation with LN and its privacy)
reply
Exactly! Go MWEB! :-)
reply
Also MWEB and confidential transactions will bring an extremely nice level of privacy to BTC with the advantage, like LN, that it's not mandatory (not on chain), but optional. It's being proven very successful on LTC already.