I think it's more nostr that should integrate with sn, by formalising in nips the features for paying to post to a relay, tipping, and web of trust etc, all of them still sorely missing in nostr atm imho.
Or should sn just become a nostr client that curates content, a bit like a layer 2 on top of nostr, as described here https://read.pourteaux.xyz/p/the-moral-imperative-of-a-distributed?
Nostr is a protocol, it's clients a relays the ones that need to implement all of that. NS would do it, if it really happened to use nostr as its backend. It'd be amazing.
reply