If you look at the breakdown by implementation, it's almost all LND, CLN is around 13%, eclair is under 2%. It would be great to have more CLN, especially because... TARO makes me nervous. I understand that's where you're expertise is though.
Yes, I follow the sentiment. I did like using LNDg a lot though, so unless I find something else equivalent, I might have to stick with LND. CLN is doing good work.
Currently, LND is the one that has had several publicized bugs, but that comes with being the most used implementation I imagine. It's probably the most stress-tested at the moment.
Taro and RGB are indeed something I'll be watching closely. Even though they claim that only entry and exit nodes will knowingly be interacting with Taro/RGB, it'll definitely change the routing dynamics from routing nodes in between if things catch on.
reply