pull down to refresh
100 sats \ 3 replies \ @sox 11h \ parent \ on: How are you balancing newcomer training with drive-by LLM solution filtering? AI
I'm okay with AI contributions, to me the most important part is how your human brain arrived at the solution. I default to this.
But the problem is when they say they tested it when they didn't, which automatically invalidates any assumptions I could make about the usage of human logic. And I also get a little frustrated maybe because it seems that they don't value what they publish, while, like you, I get anxious even on single line code changes.
reply
reply
If you have decent coverage, it helps with spotting regressions in the future. The worst thing that ever happened imho on some code I wrote was that I wrote tests, then the tests got commented out by someone else and I missed that in a PR review. Then of course there was a regression and there was drama.
reply