pull down to refresh
30 sats \ 4 replies \ @hampus 9 Jan 2023 \ parent \ on: Is LND (Lightning Labs) ruining the Lighting Network? bitcoin
Yes. You don't decide what other people do with their time.
Lightning Labs is not holding back BOLT12 as claimed in the OP. It's as far as I can tell approved for inclusion to lnd.
You can read more here: https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/issues/5594#issuecomment-1150822223
Yes, you go ahead and shit other people's hard work. That's really nice of you. I'm sure you're a super developer.
The point was to show that lnd is indeed collaborating with the rest.
Yes, you go ahead and shit other people's hard work. That's really nice of you. I'm sure you're a super developer.
You call it a success story, it's not. Sorry that hit a touch spot for you.
The point was to show that lnd is indeed collaborating with the rest.
Perhaps you've never tried to open a zero conf channel with LND to another implementation. Or perhaps you've never tried to accept a zero conf channel with LND from another implementation. Maybe you should try it before calling it a success story. Sure, they collaborate, but this is a terrible example.
reply
You call it a success story, it's not. Sorry that hit a touch spot for you.
Yes, it's a success story if you stick to the topic, which is node implementation collaboration.
Perhaps you've never tried to open a zero conf channel with LND to another implementation. Or perhaps you've never tried to accept a zero conf channel with LND from another implementation. Maybe you should try it before calling it a success story. Sure, they collaborate, but this is a terrible example.
Stick to the topic.
reply
They collaborated and failed, okay great example. Thanks for the conversations and confirmation.
reply
Bruh. What is your problem? It's one example of a collaboration out of many.
It was meant to show that it's just pure FUD that lnd isn't involved in the BOLT process.
And it's not a failed collaboration. Issues are actively being addressed.
reply