I'd imagine removing trust allows the territory to show posts purely ranked by number of sats zapped.
Since 30% of a zap goes to the community pool, it would be expensive for a poster to self-zap in order to reach the top of such a feed.
The question is, would it be expensive enough to stop self-zappers from dominating the rankings when the rankings are solely based on number of sats zapped?
I'd imagine removing trust allows the territory to show posts purely ranked by number of sats zapped.
Since 30% of a zap goes to the community pool, it would be expensive for a poster to self-zap in order to reach the top of such a feed.
The question is, would it be expensive enough to stop self-zappers from dominating the rankings when the rankings are solely based on number of sats zapped?