pull down to refresh

It is insane that that crazy Luke has been able to launder his reputation, and to be considered a serious person/developer. Somehow, he has convinced some naive and stupid people to run Knots. Go count in tonal, lol. Know your history.
Its an intelligence test, and many of you lukeboys are failing badly.

Meanwhile, actual cypherpunks like Peter are being treated poorly. Listen to Peter.

Stop listening to Luke, ffs. This is the dumbest timeline

Thank you

This is a low point for SN smearing and slandering @petertodd

Most SN users are NPC

reply
1050 sats \ 2 replies \ @oomahq OP 1 Sep

Love me some damage control with my morning coffee.

The beauty of primary sources is that they cannot "smear" or "slander", they're just records. Anyone willing to make the effort can go read what actually happened 10 years ago, contrast what they read against Peter's claims and come to their own conclusion.

reply

You are not a primary source

Do you have two primary residences or clerical errors?

reply

You are a certified retard.

reply
520 sats \ 0 replies \ @clr 31 Aug

This is not about Luke. This is about having alternatives and Bitcoin Core not having a monopoly over what bitcoin is.

reply

This is just a collection of historical sources.

Feel free to click on the links and verify the information found therein against Peter's claims.

reply
1053 sats \ 4 replies \ @anon 31 Aug

Not seeing where Peter was wrong. You need to understand the context of Lukes changes, past, present and proposed. Luke tries to make arbitrary, bitcoin-breaking changes and makes a lot of noise.
Idiots hear the noise and think he is being censored.

This is not the case.
I will never forgive or forget stuff like bitcoin-0.9.3.ljr20140913.patch

reply

Sure, no one is right 100% of the time. I agree with you that attempting to hardcode a blacklist in the code for the SatoshiDice address was retarded.

But Todd's post and mine are about datacarriersize. It has nothing to do with that.

reply

Knots or Luke’s filters will create Reddit moderators in bitcoin clothing

Let the market decide

Unless you think censorship creates better outcomes, see Reddit

reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 15 Sep

Wow even this guy gets it

reply

HA, LMAO

reply

Your headline says otherwise

Peter is spreading lies is hardly an objective impartial title

reply

I still haven’t looked at knots.

Not interested

This whole ordinals/filters/core thing has really brought out the egos in the space.
At least with the blocksize wars we knew who the enemy was...big businesses (Coinbase, etc.) and crooks (Craig Wright etc.).
Now with filters, etc. there's a whole new split.

@freetx

reply

HellO, PediTodd. Nice try.