pull down to refresh

42 sats \ 4 replies \ @mtk4000 4 Sep \ parent \ on: Core & Knots aren't the only choices bitcoin
If that's the only argument, it's more nonsensical than I thought. You need software to decode an OP_RETURN and you need different software to decode an inscription. The distinction is completely inconsequential. At least, I don't see how an inscription offers any plausible deniability of anything. It's tied to an input instead of an output.
write
preview
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @1984 4 Sep
hmm I see your point, honestly can't remember the entire argument and also forgot which influencer said it, and don't wan to go back to find out
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @SimpleStacker 4 Sep
I mean, even a jpeg needs to be decoded
Thus, the argument really rests on an understanding of the law, which I am not seeing any discussion of.
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @nout 4 Sep
The law around this is even more stupid than you would expect and so the difference between inscriptions and op_return is inconsequential.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @SimpleStacker 23h
I'll take your word for it. I'm too afraid to look it up. But it boggles my mind that people keep using this argument without first being clear on what the law even says
reply