pull down to refresh

123 sats \ 4 replies \ @fourrules 5 Sep \ parent \ on: Bitcoin-based UBI - Metamick tech
What you're is participation income, and that is where we are headed ultimately. It just needs to be decentralised in it's administration, you can't have an party allowed to determine what is and is not a valid contribution to society, needs to be a market system funded by artfully debasing the fiat currency.
write
preview
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @orto 5 Sep
Why do you think of it as one party? There are all parties in the municipalities. Yours may be different out there. The important thing is to be able to bring decent and good people to the administration. We're all focused on our petty interests...
reply
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @fourrules 5 Sep
I'm not referring to a political party, but the permanent administration, the system, which is only lightly influenced by political parties.
reply
102 sats \ 1 reply \ @orto 5 Sep
OK. I think the problem is with people. No system can function properly unless there are decent individuals. We need to develop people.
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @fourrules 5 Sep
You don't sound like a Bitcoiner.
Surely you agree that Bitcoin is premised on selfishness, goodness out of greed, and that the underlying principles of proof of work apply to literally any social system?
Bitcoin is part of a continuum, the next step in incremental progress of our species, from barbarism towards grace.
reply