pull down to refresh

166 sats \ 4 replies \ @optimism 6 Sep \ parent \ on: Where does the filtering stop? bitcoin
it does not functionally work when I tested sending bitcoin in the field with my own node
I remember it used to be like that - with 0.12 or so - but it should be fixed now. iirc the main issue is that since smartfees tracks the number of blocks it took for a tx to be mined since we saw it, there is no good fee estimation (though this could be fixed.)
I run a blocksonly node to serve history for others' IBD over tor, but I've compiled it w/o wallet so I cannot test it quickly right now (and I don't really like testing on mainnet anyway). I'll build and run some reproducible tests tomorrow, because it should work (as permissioned txs should be forwarded as well, so I'll test that too) - and if not, I think that it's patch-worthy - I'd gladly work on a fix if this was regressed (and with it supply a test with higher coverage.)
my peers (i'd say most) start to disconnect from me
There are 2 blocks-only slots and 8 non-blocks-only outgoing connection slots per node, so you'll serve a smaller subset of total connections, yes, and it'll take longer to serve many incoming peers.
write
preview
100 sats \ 3 replies \ @BITC0IN 6 Sep
iirc I only had one consistent peer when being blocksonly=1 when trying to sync to the chaintip. once at the chaintip I think i got more peers, but still very few.
Thanks for looking into this, me and the one other user in the world who used this feature appreciate it.
oh also, there's some edge cases with lightning nodes who switch blocksonly=1 on too. terrible cases of channel opens being stuck in some instances (just me lol) that required LND updates to flush out.
also,
put me in the release notes! ;D
reply
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 6 Sep
there's some edge cases with lightning nodes
If LND now supports blocksonly then that's an awesome improvement that I didn't know worked. I remember needing a mempool for it to work in the past.
put me in the release notes! ;D
lol!
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @BITC0IN 6 Sep
If LND now supports blocksonly then that's an awesome improvement that I didn't know worked. I remember needing a mempool for it to work in the past.
no I don't think it does work, which is what I found out the hard way with some stuck channel opens.
Might be worth it for LND to disable that argument actually, now that I think about. it's a foot gun that I used well to clean the toes of my node.
go make a PR and claim credit!
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 6 Sep
go make a PR and claim credit!
I'd literally have to do it under this nym to maintain at least some semblance of nymity - it's throwaway so there won't be real credit. Which is great.
reply