pull down to refresh

63 sats \ 3 replies \ @Coinsreporter 7 Sep \ parent \ on: SN is clumsy [and I'm worse] meta
Maybe we're just discussing about all of it in vain, there might just not be enough Bitcoiners who can make SN a community of a million people.
Maybe we first need to promote Bitcoin, SN will then be promoted automatically.
write
preview
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 7 Sep
I care more about the vibrancy of SN than the number of stackers.
Even just doubling our active users (assuming quality remains high) would make a huge difference.
reply
42 sats \ 1 reply \ @Coinsreporter 7 Sep
I can't agree more. I also think if our sleeping stackers rise again, it'd make a huge difference too.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 7 Sep
My view has pretty much always been that retaining contributors is better than attracting new ones. Unfortunately, we don't know much about how to do either
reply