pull down to refresh
102 sats \ 2 replies \ @028559d218 OP 8 Sep \ parent \ on: Murch and Chris have a conversation - What is Going on Here??? bitcoin
It seems to me a government could just upload a 'bad file' or bad image in an inscription...
Then blame Bitcoin for hosting 'bad files' or classified data or whatever.
Just like I articulated in this post #1211686
I find it very, very hard to believe the general public, courts, or jury would have any idea of the technical differences between op_return and Witness scripts...
To the general public they're all the same so this distinction that Knots advocates are making (in my humble opinion) just doesn't hold water.
You're ignoring the fact that policy changes mean nodes relay it before it's confirmed, so they are directly implicated, as opposed to a bad actor engaging in graffiti with the complicity of a negligent and identifiable miner.
reply
That's not the way government will look at it.
Government will say "oh it's in the blocks" therefore "all nodes" (Listening nodes) are relaying this stuff.
Which they can't do because its illegal. It doesn't matter what relay policy says... if it gets in one block it's everywhere and if I were government that's the way I would attack it.
reply