pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @didiplaywell OP 10h \ parent \ on: Debunking the Slander on Charlie Kirk: what he *Actually* said on Gun Deaths Politics_And_Law
But what proofs do you need? He was killed on the spot in one of his events. Do you have proof that a person killed in an assault was killed just to steal his money? And when the murderer confesses would you still say "we will never truly know"? It doesn't matter at all what your inner intentions are, your actions speak for you. If you kill the guy in the middle of an event, you're attacking free speech. Regardless of all the reserves you may have on what the inner intentions were, this will effectively affect how people express in public from now on. And you will see that.
There is a difference between fact and plausibility.
And when the murderer confesses would you still say "we will never truly know"?
This is a good question. I think I would say it is plausible enough then that we can say it's a fact.
this will effectively affect how people express in public from now on.
I know, I agree.
reply
Fair enough.