pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @79c9095526 OP 2h \ parent \ on: Rules for thee, not for me lol
He specifically says you should ALWAYS oppose someone getting fired over a controversial speech.
It couldn't be any more clear how he is contradicting himself.
Take away your feelings about the situation, it isn't about that. It is about firing someone over a tweet, which he clearly disagreed with ALWAYS (meaning, without exception), but now he would like people to be fired over a tweet.
This isn't that complicated ;)
write
preview
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 2h
I'm curious. Who is should be more ashamed in your view: matt walsh for contradicting himself or people celebrating the murder of a guy whose speech they disagreed with?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @79c9095526 OP 1h
You're changing the subject to remove focus from the point of this post. You want to make this about something else to avoid the difficult reality of his change in stance when it no longer is beneficial to him.
The post is about a man saying no one should ever get fired for sending out a controversial tweet. But that seemingly only applies to people on "his team" that send out controversial tweets. It does not apply to 'others' who send out controversial tweets that he dislikes.
reply