pull down to refresh

This week in Manchester, UK, scientists will be deliberating whether to restrict research that could eventually enable ‘mirror life’ — synthetic cells built from molecules that are mirror images of those found in the natural world.
Over the past year, many scientists have voiced concerns over experiments that might lead to the creation of such cells, suggesting that they would pose an enormous risk to human health and the environment. “Pretty much everybody agrees” that mirror-image cells would be “a bad thing”, says John Glass, a synthetic biologist at the J. Craig Venter Institute in La Jolla, California.
But there are disagreements about where to draw lines to limit research on mirror-image biology, given the potential benefits of such studies.
Many of the molecules in our bodies are ‘chiral’ — that is, they take one of two mirror-image (MI) forms, like right-handed and left-handed gloves. Proteins are built from left-handed amino acids, and DNA twists like a right-handed screw, for example.
I've posted about this long ago, but can't seem to find the article for now.
If it can be done, humans are going to do it.
If an entire mirror-image cell were ever made, it might proliferate uncontrollably in the body or spread unchecked through the environment, some researchers say.
But this seems like a pretty wild outcome. My impression of this world is that it is not so fragile as all that. Of course, I'm also pretty ignorant.
reply
If it can be done, humans are going to do it.
True that. As proven by gain of function research on viruses. Funded by the US, carried out in Wuhan~~
Yeah, I'm also pretty ignorant in this field. But if even researchers say it's dangerous (and not only some flat earthing YouTube), there may be an ounce of truth to it:
Still, researchers are making progress on technologies that could underpin that work; and in 2019, before the potential risks were realized, the US National Science Foundation awarded research grants to ‘boot up’ a mirror cell. Adamala, one of the grant recipients, says her growing concerns convinced her and her colleagues to drop the work.
reply
Just watched this, gave me some extra background information. Funny he also makes mention of gain of function research~~
Still no expert, but I now better remember the potential risk that people see with this kind of research.
I'm in the camp of potential benefits outweighing unknown risks.
EDIT: Best comment award under the YT video goes to @CaptainSauce with "That's great and all but have we considered shareholder value?"
reply