reply on: Why LND is taking much longer to implement BOLT12? \ stacker news ~lightning

pull down to refresh

55 sats \ 6 replies \ @88b0c423eb OP 7h \ parent \ on: Why LND is taking much longer to implement BOLT12? lightning

I didn't understand how thos eextensions work, how to activate them, how to setup runes to connect to RTL. I found it very complicated and the documentation very confusing, maybe I am too used to LND and don't want to put the effort to learn CLN.

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 6h

yeah imo CLN definitely needs better user documentation, but it's good for developers

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @88b0c423eb OP 6h

I see, do you use some fee management for LND? I used to like charge-LND but it seems dead on github. Now using litd, but it seems so fiat and a loss of privacy having to connect to lightning labs server, I may turn it off soon. LNDg I tried but very heavy on my hardware.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 6h

I am currently not running a lightning node

But when I was running a LND node, I only opened a private channel to SN and that was all I needed

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @88b0c423eb OP 6h

Oh I see

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @88b0c423eb OP 7h

What I miss the most on LND is something like lightning terminal but on the server, not having to connect to lightning labs servers.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @justin_shocknet 4h

Lightning.Pub, LND dashboard that connects over Nostr... the dashboard is in ShockWallet but in a very barebones state

Lightning.Pub is the CLINK reference server