I'm surprised that you call the hard, objective line of consensus rules as "moral relativism." There is nothing relative about it. Consensus rules are clear, objective defined rules -- that's how the whole world comes to agree on a new block every 10 minutes.

Consensus is the only thing you can actually enforce (by refusing coins that don't adhere to the consensus rules you like).

Policy, on the the other hand, cannot be forced on any node except your own.

I'm happy for you to run any policy you like, just as I'm happy for someone to run a libre relay client with a very permissive relay policy.

Policy cannot be enforced and you have no control over what policy anyone else chooses to run -- just as you have no control over policies any developer decides to release code for.

I think this demonstrates my point: if following consensus rules makes me a "shitcoiner infection," you may want to reconsider what coin you are using. It sounds like you don't like the consensus rules.

I will note that in this conversation, you have been more willing to engage in such behavior than I.