pull down to refresh

This WSJ article got me thinking:
Do people actually like lounges?
Last time we were at the airport, we skipped the lounge because we didn't want to wait in lines that looked like this:
And I looked at the comments and this one resonated with me:
The lounge is supposed to be relaxing. It's not relaxing if it's crowded and I have to wait in line to get in. And usually the food is not that great -- you can find more variety in the various airport restaurants.
I haven't visited a lounge in quite a while. I usually find grabbing a bite, getting to the gate early, and grabbing a seat to be more relaxing than going to a lounge.
And if you're wondering why I even have lounge access to begin with, it's because my wife likes messing around with credit cards and fiat miles
300 sats \ 1 reply \ @freetx 20 Sep
These days, the value prop is much lower for airport lounges.
Back in early 00s - they offered a few things that you couldn't find elsewhere in airport: Namely work cubicle w/ comfy seat + wifi.
Most airports now have ample wifi, food, drinks, etc....so maybe the only thing is the "comfy" atmosphere (airports are never really comfy tho...)
One of the best uses I ever had of a lounge was the Heathrow lounge used to have private showers (probably still do). That meant after an overnight flight I could take a quick shower on landing so I could go straight from airport to London office without needing to first do the whole hotel checkin routine. But admittedly thats a pretty narrow usecase.
reply
Yeah, I remember having a good impression of lounges from when I was younger. But in recent years they haven't felt worth going to.
reply
I gotta say: just your average Starbucks does 80% of a good lounge. Airport Starbucks might legit be $20 (20,277Sats) for a coffee and two sandwiches. Cozy leather armchair, coffee, food, internet - what more do you want?
reply
153 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 20 Sep
I usually just wait by the gate. I have used the lounges a couple times. They are ok but I am just not in that mindset when I am travelling. I just want to get to the gate, get on the plane and get where I am going. I guess it would make sense if you had a long layover or were travelling with a group for business.
reply
That's how I feel too. Having to watch the time while I'm in the lounge so I can still walk to the gate on time is another added small stress
reply
122 sats \ 0 replies \ @leo 20 Sep
Flying sucks generally, and lounges are just a way to upsell you on a slightly less bad experience. Trains in Europe or Asia are amazing, especially when the station is downtown. You can sip aperitivos in a cute local cafe, then ten minutes later speed with 200mph towards your destination. No security, no queues, no faux status upgrades. I'll always take a 6h train ride over a 1h flight.
reply
Used to be a big fan of American Express Centurion lounges but the cost and crowdedness made them not as desirable.
But I think the have value for long layovers but Justin is right if layover times were shorter and the actual flights themselves provided more services the demand for lounges would fall.
reply
51 sats \ 0 replies \ @aljaz 20 Sep
I used to go to lounges all the time if not for anything else than to grab couple bottles of water (i had free access through a card), sadly nowadays very few still have water you can take with you. Also they are all full everywhere.
I've had some long layovers where a lounge gets handy, but the golden days are over, same with the flying, business used to be great, nowadays its just slightly better than cattle class.
reply
Try first class lounges
reply
unfortunately i'm not rich enough
reply
51 sats \ 0 replies \ @sox 20 Sep
I am afraid to lose the flight by going into a lounge honestly
reply
I hate them all, airports too. Hard to imagine a more fiat places. Will we overcame it someday with more local airports and boats to long time traveling?
reply
It really depends on the airport and airline.
  • The smaller AA ones at PHL/DFW/SFO/PHX are okay. BOS you gotta be lucky, JFK/MIA and main at DFW aren't worth it
  • Air France / Delta lounges have been awfully busy everywhere I've been so I'm no longer doing those
  • Cathay in HK is ok-ish
  • LHR (BA) or AMS (KLM) are insane - don't do it
Ultimately, the AA lounge at DEN is good, the tiny one at SNA too. The big skyteam lounge at MAD terminal 1 has a terrace which is awesome when its not scorching out.
reply
Very rare I have a layover long enough to warrant it, but the few times I had it was a game changer.
7 hours in Dublin once, pre-covid, the shower and reclined seat I could nap in made it bearable. Wasn't at all crowded.
3 hours in Detroit, during covid, lounges were closed... but I was also like one of 4 people in the airport so the whole terminal was like a personal lounge.
4 hours in DFW, cubicle to work from and clean bathrooms made that day suck a lot less.
Had 3.5 hours in Vegas this year but lounges were full. Had they not been, I'd gladly have paid the $50 to have somewhere quiet'ish and comfortable to crack my laptop and not have to pack everything up just to use the bathroom. The food court was unbearable to work from after a bit so most of that time I spent zonked out with headphones at the gate, which was empty until about an hour before the flight.
Capacity is the biggest issue these days, but every major carrier seems to be dumping a fortune on bigger better lounges right now. The paradox with lounges is you'd need them less if there wasn't so much buffer time needed prior to departure, delays, and long connections.
reply
What an interesting article from the Wall Street Journal. I love the idea of airport lounges: they offer that oasis of comfort and tranquility in the midst of the chaos of traveling.
reply
Do not particularly like airport lounges and do not like flying either. Airlines are the height of fiat debt based capitalism and its consumption driven planet wrecking excesses, imo. I like trains, boats and hiking in the woods.
reply