pull down to refresh

No, consensus will be coordinated accords multiple implementations as it is now.
There is no need for a centralized repo to control Bitcoin
Its possible. But "as it is now" is basically people copying core.
Either directly, like Knots, or as a reference, like btcd and libbitcoin
If Core goes further down the path of restriction, and people keep being banned from the bips repo, it would be good to have some place where they can be heard. Maybe that place is nostr. Or... Op_returns. Lol
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @sudonaka 20 Sep
Yeah I agree there should be another repo. It’s not “needed” tho is my point.
People should start another one with the intention of being the open, neutral, strictly reference client.
reply
Right now, no. The future need depends on how much further the polarization goes.
reply