pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 12 replies \ @ek OP 21 Sep \ parent \ on: Official Coinos Guide meta
lol I had to deeply suck air in when I read this
I wish we could use the same connection for both but no.
Maybe I will have some suggestions for the spec, because the UX around permissions is by far the biggest pain point when it comes to NWC.
write
preview
1033 sats \ 11 replies \ @nout 21 Sep
The coinos NWC string includes the lightning address (e.g. xxxxx&lud16=nout@coinos.io), so why do users have to set it up separately? Can't you just parse that and use it? Is lud16 not what I think it is and the fact that it matches my receive lightning address is just coincidence?
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek OP 21 Sep
damn, unfortunately the 700 sats for my zap couldn't be forwarded to your wallet because no route was found
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @nout 21 Sep
There's a big chance that I actually don't have it configured correctly somewhere :)
reply
231 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek OP 21 Sep
You did receive 70 sats here though
So I guess the route is very illiquid
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @nout 21 Sep
I guess I need to zap more to balance the channels :)
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek OP 21 Sep
haha yes
reply
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek OP 21 Sep
Oh, to be honest, I just haven't noticed that Coinos includes it and completely forgot that NWC strings can include it!
We can definitely do something with that, great idea, thank you!
reply
100 sats \ 4 replies \ @nout 21 Sep
Yeah, my original question was meant to complain about the UX when I have to set up send and then receive to lightning address separately even though it could all be done as a single step.
reply
77 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek OP 21 Sep
Btw, you definitely earned that description in my eyes now:
Chief user experience complainer
Missing that NWC strings can include a lud16 parameter was definitely incompetence on my end haha
reply
55 sats \ 1 reply \ @nout 21 Sep
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek OP 21 Sep
embarrassment-driven development
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek OP 21 Sep
I am quite embarrassed that I haven't thought of this, but you are totally right, if it includes lud16, we can totally use that to setup receive haha
reply