This is a tricky topic, and there are no easy answers. On one hand, you've got cultural appropriation, which is when a bigger, dominant culture takes stuff from a minority culture without really understanding or respecting where it came from. Studies, like the one from Dr. C. Richard King, about how Native American symbols get taken, show how this can completely erase the original meaning and just turn it into a quick fashion trend or a fad. Just an example.
Shouldn't we celebrate different cultures mixing and influencing each other? I mean, if you look at the history of art, music, and food, it's full of cultures borrowing from one another. It'd be wrong to just call that appropriation when it's really a creative mash-up. The case with Chef René Redzepi, who worked closely with indigenous communities to reinterpret Nordic food, is often used as a good example of collaboration and mutual respect instead of appropriation.
So, where do you draw the line? Is the difference all about respect or giving credit?
What do you all think about this? Got any examples of appropriation or appreciation you wanna share?