pull down to refresh

There's a lot if interesting stuff in here:
This ambiguity was compounded when author attribution was removed from NIPs. This change, while seemingly minor, had a significant impact on accountability...The removal of authorship in Nostr created a vacuum where it's unclear who is responsible for the quality and consequences of a specification.
This has led to a challenging environment for developers. Without clear attribution, the natural filter of reputation is diminished. In well-governed projects, developers build credibility through thoughtful contributions, helping the community assess future proposals. The lack of formal contribution tracking in Nostr makes it difficult to recognize work that drives the protocol forward. This, combined with inconsistent processes, has led to a sense of unpredictability, raising the barrier to entry for new contributors.
Lots of people have probably recognized this before, but this note really made me realize how important reputation is for open systems.
Reputation is an important part of bitcoin governance.
reply
well sure, in a nutshell act as responsible adults while being on #nostr, and then we won't need a parental centralized authority to tell us what we can or we cannot do.
reply