pull down to refresh

You’re arguing in bad faith and trying to make it a religious thing. I won’t argue anything along the road you are trying to lead.
It’s about a crazy man doing crazy things. Not about religion.
in the first, I said there are false analogies being made of protocol consensus with social consensus. im not defending Dash. Im taking issue with the rhetoric in the article.
just as physics isnt concerned with religion, im not so sure bitcoin is; so it is, I think, with the other social mores that Lopp and you don't seem to like about Dash.
reply