pull down to refresh

Fiji Simo, OpenAI's new director of applications, is looking for someone to lead the company's monetization efforts, including subscriptions and advertising in ChatGPT.
The new director will report directly to Simo. She oversees nearly all of OpenAI's divisions, except for research, infrastructure, hardware, and security, which remain under Altman.
91 sats \ 5 replies \ @optimism 16h
If you weren't thinking already that you are the product, perhaps this will make you think again?
reply
We’re both the product and the algorithm these days, now that attention is basically a commodity. For people who are already paying a monthly fee, it makes zero sense to still get hit with ads, it feels like a kind of violation. I didn’t read the full news, but maybe the ads are just for the free or basic plans. Or maybe if you pay a bit more, they stop spamming you with ads.
reply
38 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 14h
I think the problem is a little more profound than ads alone though. OpenAI is showing to be a bit of a predatory organization, like Google, Facebook and TikTok before them (but we only worry about it when it's Chinese, lol). Interacting with their platform is a vote to be abused in any way they legally can, to improve their bottom line at diminishing benefit to the customer over time. For most people this isn't a problem until it's too late, but it's always good to recognize potential issues and ask yourself "what am I doing?"
This critical thinking is what the hype+fomo has successfully killed, and when the masses will fully turn against chatbots, and AI in general, because of the corporate players that have exploited them, Sam will be ultra rich and find new ways to exploit the masses, just like Zuck does. However, this happening will probably be good for the tech.
reply
Yep. I'm afraid you're right. It looks like they're following the same playbook as big tech: first it's free or with no ads, people get hooked, and then they just bleed you dry.
reply
125 sats \ 1 reply \ @tomlaies 16h
Users are certainly the product in Google, Youtube, all social medias ... but for ChatGPT users are paying $20 - $200 bucks a month. You'd think paying money would mean users are the customers. Looks like OpenAI thinks these $20 are the fee for the privilege of being the product.
reply
You'd think paying money would mean users are the customers.
That's what I said when Twitter did the paid thing: "cool, from user to customer".
But I haven't seen that shift. Customers still behave like they are the product, and customer service is still abhorrent. (Oh and people actually lose their checkmark?!? whut?)
Looks like OpenAI thinks these $20 are the fee for the privilege of being the product.
Yes. And if X gets away with it, so will OpenAI, I'm sure.
reply
131 sats \ 3 replies \ @OT 14h
This is when the evil arrives. Funneling customers into paid solutions but making it appear as a genuine response.
reply
32 sats \ 0 replies \ @ken 12h
Great point, @OT! You know what's also great? Chipotle. Use promo code OPENAI for free guac.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 8h
Arrives? Its always been there.
reply
Exactly! This is going to be insidious. People are already forming attachments to their chat bots. Now imagine that the chat bots start slipping ads into their responses.
reply
30 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 12h
Everything turns to ads on a long enough horizon (because ads are the superior form of human communication).
reply
Soon we're all gonna be hitlers doing nothing but watching ads all day
reply
A lot of people used google search to look up symptoms they might be noticing to self diagnose and I would assume they would also use ChatGPT in a similar manner. Now imagine the type of ads those people will see between their conversations with ChatGPT, I doubt they’ll see natural remedy solutions to their symptoms. I could be wrong though.
reply
hahahahahahahahahahaha.....it was to be expected, or we believed that by limiting the use of versions they would force you to pay, now you have something more, pay to not see advertising in addition to selling your data and conversations, we have always been the product.
reply
Ha of course they are.
reply
Obviously, it won’t be free forever.
Those who have the hardware to do so should run local models and become independent of the tech giants.
reply