pull down to refresh

It’s the Poor That Need a Revolution, Not the Rich
Let’s be honest, but I think: the rich don’t need a revolution. Why would they? I think, the system already works for them. They sit closer to the printer. They get the loans. They own the assets. They're favoured by the policy makers.
It’s the poor who get crushed. The ones told to “rely” in a system where "compliance" is a guaranteed exploitation, disguised as "convenience". The ones dependent on subsidies, rations, or government handouts — scraps thrown from the very people who broke the system in the first place.
And here’s the painful part: many of the poor they ignorantly reject the solution. Not because they’ve studied it, but because they’ve been conditioned to think they’re “safe” under the same system that exploit them daily. They defend the cage because it’s the only one they’ve ever known.
Bitcoin flips that. It gives the poor a weapon the rich can’t rig. No gatekeepers. No confiscation. No masters, No slaves. Just money that works the same for a farmer, a shopkeeper, or a billionaire.
But here’s the catch: Bitcoin it won’t chase anyone. You have to want it. You have to see the corruption in the existing system for what it is, and decide you’re done playing their game. The poor they need this revolution more than anyone. Yet too many are still waiting for politicians to save them, instead of saving themselves.
The rich will be fine. They always are. The question is: will the poor wake up in time to use the tool that was built for them?
Framing it as rich vs. poor misses the key point: it’s state privilege vs. voluntary exchange. The problem is politicized money and intervention, not wealth itself.
reply