pull down to refresh
110 sats \ 2 replies \ @Scoresby OP 28 Sep \ parent \ on: Failing to Understand the Exponential, Again - Julian Schrittwieser AI
How would we even go about measuring the net effect of smart phones?
A lot of us (myself included) probably feel like we spend WAY too much time looking at our phones. But then again, prior to the printing press, pretty much nobody looked at books. That change took longer, but comparing the amount of time a person in 1990 spent reading to somebody in 1300, it might feel like a pretty big shift, even an unhealthy shift. I'm sure that there's a case to be made that books have changed humans in inhuman ways.
So, yes, smart phones are unhealthy, but they also come with a lot of benefits (instant access to all the information on earth + ability to talk to anyone anywhere anytime + google maps + ...).
AI is probably gonna feel like smartphones in that it will seep into our lives way more than we are comfortable with.
Also, there's this: I don't know how to resist strong technological change. I spent a lot of the first few decades of my life resisting technology. But looking back now (from the vantage of the smart phone I'm clutching in my sweaty hands), it seems like my resistance was futile at best, wrong-headed at worst.
Yeah I don't think there's a real way to measure that, since everyone disagrees on what makes for a good society anyway.
I just think that for me, personally, I'm willing to give up the benefits of the smartphone to return to a society where everyone was more present, focused, and engaged, versus distracted by their phones all the time. Especially when it comes to the youth.
We can still communicate on the go from anywhere (dumb phone era). We also had access to interactive maps (GPS systems). Those to me were the two most useful features of smartphones that i'd want to keep, but they were already available.
reply
I don't think it's really an issue of the technology being a net negative as much as it's an issue of social norms not having adapted to the new technology yet.
reply