pull down to refresh

514 sats \ 4 replies \ @pillar 28 Sep \ on: the more mempools differ, the slower compact blocks transfer bitcoin

The premise that some marginal improvement on miner efficiency is a higher priority than nodes being sovereign on their private mempools is... funny.

write
preview
69 sats \ 0 replies \ @standardcrypto OP 29 Sep

attacking Bitcoin can be done as a self sovereign act.

that doesn't mean there aren't social or economic consequences.

reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @BITC0IN 28 Sep

Also, this is a problem for miners, not node runners.

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @adlai 28 Sep

are you familiar with "noisy neighbor problem" ?

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @_bilthon_ 28 Sep

Marginal improvement on miner efficiency should be a priority to whoever cares about mining decentralization.

reply