Hmm no it doesn't matter how ***you*** link it. What matters is how my LLM reads what you linked and then summarizes it, for me.

Don't trust, verify... and then verify the verifier.

So: 

BAD :(

[Optimization daemons](https://arbital.greaterwrong.com/p/daemons/).

GOOD :)

I'm still struggling with the idea that optimization pressure [can produce something that is at odds with the broader system in which is it running and from which the pressure stems.](https://arbital.greaterwrong.com/p/daemons/)

Scoresby

You shouldn't replace the link; you should replace/augment the link text. This battles clickbait.

[Here are 20 ways you will die young](example.com)

hyperlinks

When AI summaries replace hyperlinks, thought itself is flattened | Aeon Essays

You shouldn't replace the link; you should replace/augment the link text. This battles clickbait.

`[Here are 20 ways you will die young](example.com)`

into

`[Lorum Ipsum](example.com)`