Yeah why you need a legacy player to bring credibility. Blockstream has done fine with tokenization 

Agree but DTCC is owned by the institutions that use it which incentivizes them to make sure it doesn’t fail. 

Whereas onchain any bullshit crypto entity can say they are custodying RWA and issue tokens out of thin air. There might be more transparency in the tokens but not the underlying.

grayruby

Stacker_Stocks

Tokenization of RWA is an Unstoppable ‘freight train’ Coming to Major Markets

Cje95

>I think it is stupid and inherently risky but I do see the use case 

element of truth there, but its less stupid than the DTCC - which is itself just a rudimentary "tokenization" scheme (ie real shares are deposited into DTCC and you get a 'claim token' against them deposited into your brokerage account). 

The simple fact of having no visibility into the DTCC makes me think there must be massive fraud going on....how many shares have they re-hypothecated? 

