
>This has also drifted rather far from the initial argument about parks, which has no national security parallel.

Sure about that there, Mr. NSA? 

>To answer your silly question directly, though, there are hundreds of roads connecting the country that are not operated by the feds. There's also no reason why states would seek to shut them down, since their purpose is to facilitate commerce for the states.

You are arrogant and insulting. Money or lack of it, shuts many things down. This specific conversation is at an end. 

jbschirtzinger

econ

Government Shutdown Shows Why We Need to Decentralize National Parks (2019)

Undisciplined

There were motor vehicles before 1956 and it's very unlikely we'd ever need the specific federal roads to repel an invasion.

This has also drifted rather far from the initial argument about parks, which has no national security parallel.

To answer your silly question directly, though, there are hundreds of roads connecting the country that are not operated by the feds. There's also no reason why states would seek to shut them down, since their purpose is to facilitate commerce for the states.