If a state truly wanted Bitcoin reserves without spending too much capital directly, acquiring through indirect strategic partnerships or voluntary agreements with existing large holders is far more feasible than outright forced nationalisation. The trick would be to make it seem like a mutually beneficial alignment rather than a desperate grab. This is why the political relationships you hint at become important. Influence and legacy do weigh heavy in such decisions, but both sides would try to control the framing because reputation in these circles is as much a currency as the assets themselves.