pull down to refresh

Tox is more secure than Signal. Tox is true decentralised encrypted privacy immune to surveillance.
What's tox? share a link
reply
reply
Thanks but I still prefer xmpp and simplex
reply
You are free to give your phone number and device identity to a centralised data base that is inherently vulnerable to state intrusion, but don't kid yourself that it is private and secure.
reply
xmpp and simplex don't require phone number neither device id, and you can self-host. But apparently your answer was not for me.
reply
my mistake I thought you meant Signal. What is so good about simplex and xmpp? As a company Simplex is inherently centralised and thus prone to state requests for data.
reply
You're really wrong about that simplex critique. Servers are all self hostable and all simplex hosted servers have onion addresses when you do need to use them (someone sending you doesn't have their own server). offering network layer privacy and decentralization.
A great list of trusted non simplex servers can be found on Nowhere by Nihilist: http://nowherejezfoltodf4jiyl6r56jnzintap5vyjlia7fkirfsnfizflqd.onion/simplex-servers.html
Spin up your own on a vps easily, or better yet behind an onion address only on a local machine and you can talk to anybody with nearly perfect plausible deniability. XMPP simply cannot offer this level of privacy due to it's feudal federation style of decentralization.
reply
50 sats \ 2 replies \ @carter 8h
what makes it more secure? I know signals group messaging isn't great but I thought the ratchet protocol was gold standard
reply
For Signal you provide your phone number to use it. With Tox you don't. Tox is entirely decentralised. Signal isn't.
reply
35 sats \ 0 replies \ @carter 7h
You can have usernames now so you dont share your number but yeah i got you
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @jasonb OP 9h
Oh man! Rabbit hole time!
reply