pull down to refresh

This is bullshit. There is a huge amount of inefficiency is alignment issues at the beginning of ventures that fundamentally don't need the complexity of multiple people with even slightly different visions or understandings or priorities, even in the cases where both visions, if committed to, would lead to success.
Often finding product market fit requires basic knowledge of a domain not in your wheelhouse because the opportunity exists at an intersection. By vibe coding a solution, which is like no-code on steroids, a CTO can be brought on for far less equity or even as a first hire, resolving the alignment problem entirely.
I beg to differ. Applications that don’t have strong technical support are often bad. This is one of my main criticisms of Bitcoin applications the technical support is absolutely horrible. Teams relying on telegram for technical support is all you need to know.
So even if your vibe coded app gains traction you better have capital to hire a team and technical support for it to survive in the market!
reply
If you're finding product market fit it's not about the quality of the finish. I've worked with many developers and the vast majority of them are terrible founders used to getting paid and overly conscientious, they don't understand (as you don't seem to) the process of getting from zero to one.
A baby isn't a scaled down adult. Its it's own thing, optimised only for coming into existence.
So even if your vibe coded app gains traction you better have capital to hire a team and technical support for it to survive in the market!
The money and equity you save by agentic development and no-code tooling is far better spent after product market fit than before.
reply