pull down to refresh
42 sats \ 14 replies \ @SimpleStacker OP 9 Oct \ parent \ on: Research in Public #02: Posting fees affect post quantity econ
Yeah next up is probably a two way fixed effects regression with time effects and territory effects. Can throw in bitcoin price as a regressor as well.
If, as I'm imagining it, it'll be a territory-by-week panel, there will probably be lots of zeros. I wonder if you know how to efficiently run a tobit model with lots of fixed effects
I'd probably start with the subsample of territories that have posts almost every week.
Have you looked at the distribution of post output by territory? I suspect the territories that have posts every week account for 95%+ of total posts.
I forget exactly when asinh has problems, but it can perform more or less like a log that accepts zeros.
reply
Don’t make me raise posting fees to 300 sats for just @denlillaapan
reply
I really think you should consider dropping it. We want people to take part in the immortal community, right?
~Health died because they jacked the fee too high.
reply
We’re not doing 1k! U want 100?
reply
What did we start at? Was it 10 or 99 or am I misremembering completely?
reply
data to the rescue? as far as I can tell, ~HealthAndFitness started at about 100, went down to 70, and is now at 200.
reply
Thanks! I think it was 99, because I remember RBD wanting to use the old marketing trick of sitting just below 100.
@realBitcoinDog, what if we explored the territory below 70 sats?
reply
yeh, looked into the data and it was actually 99, then 69, then 200.
Pfff... Fucker.
Can't you,like, inflation-adjust it or something...?
reply
Lololol
reply