pull down to refresh

We know the formula for rewards, or at least it's public and @k00b would presumably explain it if we asked. The bigger problem is that the rewards are very complicated (intentionally so) and stackers likely factor it into their choices in a vague way, rather than precisely. I've actually been meaning to make a ~meta post about the saliency of Stacker News rewards.

Within "inherent desire to post" are a couple of separate things that we can split out and use proxxies for.

  1. Engagement: How many comments does a post generate? How many zaps do those comments receive?
  2. Reach: How many zaps were received? How many different stackers commented?

I was thinking about the choice of territory to post in and I think there are three driving forces:

  1. Desire to post in the most relevant territory
  2. Posting costs in the relevant territories
  3. Relationship with territory owners

I doubt we could quantify this claim, but perhaps we can handwave something about profits being maximized in a relevant territory to the subject matter of the post because of visibility, owner zapping, downzapping, and community engagement.

I really like the idea of random idea formation. I have no idea what distribution assumptions your going to make, but I trust your instincts.