pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @OT OP 14 Oct \ parent \ on: Support for government in China: is the data accurate? culture
I was enlightening you to a Chinese saying.
Try to stay on topic mate. The discussion is why are Chinese people satisfied with their government?
If you look at @Solomonsatoshi posts, he seems to be remarkably one-sided when it comes to China.
China = Good, and that's all there is to it. I wonder if he's paid to be the voice of China, on this site?
reply
If you read my comments you would know that what you are saying is pure and utter Bullshit.
In fact the opposite is true.
If I was a CCP bot I would not be raising the issues I do,
The response to my comments does show how in denial a lot of libertarian/westerners/bitcoiners are about the challenge China presents to western nations centuries of global domination.
You find it impossible to accept that a mixed economy with significant state led capital allocation is growing faster and has come to dominate global trade in manufactured goods and commodities because that challenges your blind faith in free markets.
Calling me a CCP bot is just a cheap lazy bigots way of avoiding the issues I raise.
reply
Because-
In general Chinese correctly recognise the crucial role government can play in economic performance.
In contrast and to highlight the first point I added the following -
'The cynical crony capitalist neoliberalised west has largely forgotten this...because bankers and capital have come to own the narrative and their 'democratic' governments and the resultant crony capitalism is not delivering economic improvement for most people.
The Libertarian ideology tragically plays into the hands of crony capitalism.'
All the above went woooosh over your head when you allege I was not on topic- Oh the irony !
The only thing in this dialogue that was off topic was your crude attempt to shoot the messenger with your 'enlightening' (ie completely irrelevant/off topic) Chinese saying.
You do not seem capable of reasoned debate when its starring you in the face, mate.
reply