pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @gregtonoski 23 Oct \ parent \ on: "Quasi-consensus": help me understand this conversation with Chris Guida bitcoin

Let's do it. Would you like to contribute and spread the word about the idea, perhaps? I am going to contribute on the technical side and I already openes the discussion on the Bitcoin-dev mailing list.

write
preview
21 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 24 Oct
I already openes the discussion on the Bitcoin-dev mailing list.

Link?

I applaud your effort to fork off.

reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @gregtonoski 24 Oct
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 24 Oct

I am not your peer, I want you to fork off.

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @gregtonoski 24 Oct

That's okay. 💪

reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby OP 23 Oct

I'll settle for their suggestion. Personally o don't think the issue is worth changing consensus rules.

But I'd respect the argument a lot more if that is what they were proposing. Good luck.

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @gregtonoski 26 Oct

If you settle for "filter proponents suggesting a change to block validation rules and standing by it" then the respect for the argument for the need of mempool policy rules comes logically, doesn't it?

reply