pull down to refresh

Interesting article on the implications of having an abundance of energy. Also quite bearish on the US which seems to be a popular theme these days.
Deindustrialization in the West is a great example of how short-term thinking can lead to great troubles. Western countries saw an immediate benefit in moving production to cheaper labor markets and benefited greatly from exploiting low-cost labor for several decades. However, we now see how this resulting lack of industry has turned into a strategic vulnerability, leaving the West unable to produce key materials such as rare earth metals on its own.
The imperative to maintain military-industrial parity with the West compelled the Soviet Union to divert immense resources into its military sector at the expense of its civilian economy. The state that justified itself by surpassing capitalism was instead consumed by it, as chronic civilian shortages eroded its ideological legitimacy and material base from within.
Today, the roles are strategically inverted. China is now the one wielding an economic advantage, using its state-backed, low-cost, and rapidly expanding energy grid as the primary strategic lever. Its cheap, abundant, and growing energy supply provides a solid basis for powering the unfolding technological revolution.
This puts the U.S. in a crippling dilemma. As we’ve established, U.S. leadership has no choice but to pursue AI; it is seen as the only technological equalizer for its deep structural disadvantages. Yet, as we’ve also seen, the U.S. has no path towards massively increasing its domestic energy output in order to keep up.
'While Large Language Models get the public hype, the actual race is for the commanding heights of the 21st century: autonomous systems, national logistics planning, economic modeling, and advanced materials science. People in Washington are terrified, and for good reason. In the Cold War, the U.S. forced the USSR to prioritize military production over the civilian standard of living. China is now turning that same playbook back on America, but with a different weapon. By forcing the U.S. to sacrifice its energy stability just to stay in the race, China is using its energy surplus to create a compounding technological gap that America’s fractured, high-cost grid cannot overcome. Yet, the U.S. has no choice but to stay in the game just as the USSR did during the Cold War.'
reply
Many people in America (especially but not only neoliberal Libertarians) don't seem to like facing the reality that this article articulates. The sheer arrogance and sense of entitlement and USAs extraordinary privilege has made itself its own worst enemy. The nation state and the quality and integrity of its government is huge, perhaps the single largest determining factor in the wealth of nations. Sadly corporate lobbyists and their Bullshit neolib/Libertarian narrative have infeacted western democracies- owning governments dominating public dialogue- now the truth is becoming inconvenient- that Chinas mixed economy where the politburo direct capital allocations toward strategic supply chains and technology has out done western capitalism at its own game. DEAL WITH IT or lose the hegemony, wealth and dominance western civilisation has enjoyed for the last 500 years!
reply